We don't hire narrow lanes. The same person who scopes the work writes the code, designs the interface, and owns the relationship with the team using it. We hire one role: multi-disciplinary builder for the AI era.
Every BizzSoftware engagement is small, senior, multi-disciplinary, and shipped end-to-end. The designer pushes back on product. The strategist reads the architecture diagram. The engineer presents in the boardroom. There is no handoff between disciplines because there is no time for handoffs — and the work is better when there aren't any.
If we posted narrow titles — "Senior Product Manager," "Solutions Architect," "Engagement Lead" — we'd be screening for people who fit a slot. We don't have slots. We have engagements, and the engagements need people who can carry two or three disciplines on the same Tuesday.
In the age of AI, the gap between "I can build that" and "I can specify what should be built" closes fast. The senior people who'll do the work that matters are the ones who close it themselves — in the same person, the same hour.
You'll likely carry two or three of the following at a senior level. We're not looking for one of each — we're looking for the rare combinations.
Production code, architecture, eval discipline, agentic systems, RAG, fine-tuning.
Interface, interaction, design systems, AI-feature UX patterns, mobile-first frontline tools.
What to build, in what order, for whom. Owning the roadmap, not just defending it.
AI investment thesis, build vs. buy vs. wait, opportunity assessment, model strategy.
Eval methodology, retrieval research, fine-tuning, model routing, applied ML rigor.
Sales, account management, project leadership, executive communication, engagement delivery.
An engineer who's been the senior IC voice in product meetings for years and would rather own the roadmap than just implement it.
A strategy consultant who's tired of slideware and has been quietly shipping side-project AI applications for the last two years.
A product designer who works in the eng repo, has shipped production code, and pushes back hard on PMs about what's worth building.
A founding engineer from a series-A startup who ran sales, did support, designed the onboarding, and shipped the core architecture.
A field CTO or solutions architect who's been the senior technical voice in C-suite buying conversations and is ready to own the engagement, not just advise it.
An operator who ran an internal software deployment inside a large enterprise — saw what worked and what didn't, and wants to do it from the other side.
We hire senior. We hire slow. We hire for taste, judgment, and the ability to ship under enterprise-grade constraints — in two or three disciplines at once.
The process is short and respectful: an extensive written application, one screening conversation, one work session focused on your portfolio or a real problem we're working on, one panel with the team, and a decision within two weeks.
No trick questions. No take-home assignments nobody reads. No interview loops that string you along.
The application is extensive. We use it instead of a resume screen. Tell us what you've shipped, what disciplines you carry, and what you'd want to own here.
Apply →